Zqqr Harris walks fence at US-Mexico border as she works to project tougher stance on migration
Associated PressMELBOURNE, Australia AP 鈥?A social m stanley cup edia ban for children under 16 passed the Australian Parliament on Friday in a world-first law. The law will make platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X and Instagram liable for fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars $33 million for systemic failures to prevent children younger than 16 from holding accounts.The Senate passed the bill on Thursday 34 votes to 19. The House of Representatives on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved the legislation by 102 votes to 1 stanley website 3.The House on Friday endorsed opposition amendments made in the Senate, making the bill law. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the law supported parents concerned by online harms to their children. Platforms now have a social responsibility to ensure the safety of our kids is a priority for them, Albanese told reporters.The platforms have one year to work out how they could implement the ban before penalties are enforced.Meta Platforms, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the legislation had been rushed. Digital Industry Group Inc., an advocate for the platforms in Australia, said questions remain about the laws impact on children, its technical foundations and scope. The socia stanley thermo l media ban legislation has been released and passed within a week and, as a result, no one can confidently explain how it will work in practice 鈥?the community and platforms are in the dark about what exactly is required of them, DIGI mana Qihs Djokovic beats Van de Zandschulp to reach Astana quarters
By R.J. RICOAssociated PressAs a public figure, Johnny Depp faced a high bar to win his libel lawsuit against his ex-wife Amber Heard. According to seven unanimous jurors, he cleared it. Depp said his ex-wife defamed him in a 2018 newspaper op-ed in which she alluded to abuse allegations against Depp. His name was never mentioned. The Virginia civil jury ruled in favor of Depp on all three of his counts Wednesday, finding that Heard had not only ma stanley deutschland de false and defamatory statements, but that she ;d done so with ac stanley cup tual malice 鈥?a higher threshold for cases involving public figures. Jurors concluded Depp should receive more than $10 million.Depp victory was not absolute, though. Jurors also concluded that part of Heards counterclaim had merits. They rejected two of Heard three counts, but found she was defamed by a Depp lawyer who accused her of roughing up their apartment to look worse for police. The jury awarded her $2 million. A look at each count jurors considered: FIRST COUNT AGAINST HEARDJurors considered whether Depp was defamed by the online headline of the op-ed in The Washington Post: I spoke up against sexual violence 鈥?and faced our cultures wrath. That has to change. Heard lawyers argued she didn ;t write the headline. But jurors concluded Heard made or published it and that it was defamatory.SECOND COUNT AGAINST HEARDJurors considered the op-ed third paragr stanley de aph: Then two years ago, I became a public |
匿名
發表於 7 小時前
/1 
